Can Jared Isaacman Win America the Second Space Race?

I. Accelerating U.S. Lunar and Deep-Space Strategy

• China’s rapid expansion of lunar and cislunar capabilities requires the United States to accelerate its own timelines.
• The Moon functions as geopolitical high ground with strategic consequences for science, economics, and security.
• Early U.S. presence is essential for shaping norms, governing resource access (including helium-3), and maintaining alliance confidence.
• Delayed U.S. return to the lunar surface risks ceding influence over future space governance and technological pathways toward Mars.

II. Sustained U.S. Presence on and Around the Moon

• Near term: Artemis II and III must proceed without delay to reestablish U.S. human missions beyond low Earth orbit.
• Medium term: infrastructure for permanent lunar activity is required, including power systems, landers, habitats, and logistics networks.
• Long term: a durable presence enables preparation for Mars missions and establishes U.S. leadership in the cislunar domain.
• Continuous occupation deters strategic displacement by China and attracts international partners to U.S.-led frameworks.

III. Nuclear Power and Propulsion as Strategic Technologies

• Nuclear surface power (for example, a 100 kW fission reactor) is essential for surviving lunar nights, producing propellant, and enabling Mars operations.
• Nuclear electric and nuclear thermal propulsion provide the high-efficiency and high-thrust capabilities required for deep-space logistics and fast transits.
• A “mini Manhattan project” approach is needed to maintain a technological edge and attract top engineering talent.
• China’s parallel investments in nuclear propulsion heighten the urgency for U.S. leadership.

IV. NASA and Space Force Coordination

• Avoid duplicate investment in facilities, propulsion testing, communications, and hypersonic research.
• NASA’s civilian research can generate technologies with security relevance while maintaining peaceful mission mandates.
• Joint use of Armstrong, Glenn, and other centers strengthens program efficiency and accelerates capability development.
• Coordinated planning creates a unified civil–military technological ecosystem that enhances U.S. strategic positioning.

V. Supply-Chain Security and Reducing Dependence on China

• Critical aerospace supply chains remain exposed to Chinese chokepoints in materials and components.
• Mapping of 54 critical minerals reveals vulnerabilities concentrated in Chinese processing and refining.
• U.S. strategy requires reshoring key manufacturing and deepening partnerships with trusted allies.
• Chinese dominance in minerals and components threatens U.S. spacecraft production, launch capability, and defense integration.

VI. A Competitive U.S. Commercial Space Ecosystem

• Industrial competition accelerates innovation, reduces costs, and increases mission redundancy.
• NASA should focus on frontier technologies and avoid duplicating industry capabilities.
• Clear articulation of NASA’s technological challenges enables private-sector alignment and investment.
• Early, prioritized use of the ISS for high-value research (quantum, biomedical, materials) is necessary to seed a sustainable orbital economy and ensure viable commercial stations.

VII. Earth Observation and Climate Data as Strategic Assets

• NASA’s Earth-science missions support agriculture, weather prediction, environmental monitoring, GPS reliability, and disaster-response systems.
• Data products have national-security value for military readiness and critical-infrastructure resilience.
• Free and open access to NASA data must be preserved for public agencies and researchers.
• China’s efforts to expand Earth-observation diplomacy amplify the strategic value of maintaining U.S. leadership.

VIII. Science, Exploration, and Technology as Integrated Pillars

• Human exploration, planetary science, Earth science, aeronautics, and technology development must advance together.
• NASA’s 1958 charter mandates Earth and space science as foundational missions.
• Budget constraints require maximizing scientific return, not prioritizing one pillar at the expense of others.
• Weakening any pillar diminishes U.S. diplomatic leverage, scientific leadership, and technological competitiveness.

IX. Quantum Technology and Orbital Infrastructure as Emerging Strategic Arenas

• Quantum communication, sensing, and computing have mission-critical applications and benefit from microgravity conditions.
• Accelerating ISS access for quantum research is essential to counter China’s progress.
• Economic and military systems rely on GPS, timing signals, and orbital infrastructure; any vulnerability constitutes a security threat.
• Dominance in quantum systems and resilient orbital architecture is central to long-term geopolitical stability.

X. International Space Diplomacy and Strategic Competition

• China is extending its influence through launch services, satellite networks, and expansion of its space station capabilities.
• The “space Silk Road” provides alternatives to U.S. partnerships, reducing automatic alignment with NASA.
• U.S. strategy must strengthen Artemis Accords, demonstrate mission reliability, and advance technological superiority.
• Diplomatic credibility depends on sustained U.S. performance and timely execution of major space missions.

Sources

1. Isaacman, Jared. “Confirmation Hearing for NASA Administrator and Assistant Commerce Secretary Nominees.” Hearing. December 3, 2025.

Playing in the Background